deepfates/entropix – Run with an API on Replicate

deepfates / entropix

Cold

Public
171 runs
T4

Run with an API

Playground API Examples README Versions

Input

prompt

string

Shift + Return to add a new line

You're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? You're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? 

Prompt to generate from

Default: "<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>\n<antThinking>\nYou're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.\n</antThinking>\n\nWhich number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11?<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>\n"

Including prompt_template

Run this model in Node.js with one line of code:

npx create-replicate --model=deepfates/entropix

or set up a project from scratch

Install Replicate’s Node.js client library:

npm install replicate

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=<paste-your-token-here>

Find your API token in your account settings.

Import and set up the client:

import Replicate from "replicate";

const replicate = new Replicate({
  auth: process.env.REPLICATE_API_TOKEN,
});

Run deepfates/entropix using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

const output = await replicate.run(
  "deepfates/entropix:d6afcfde89c75a3965fd82c8f58e77bee618cdbb1cee22ca2555d06dd28a7b4d",
  {
    input: {
      prompt: "You're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? ",
      prompt_template: "<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>\n<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>\n\n{prompt}<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>"
    }
  }
);
console.log(output);

To learn more, take a look at the guide on getting started with Node.js.

Install Replicate’s Python client library:

pip install replicate

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=<paste-your-token-here>

Find your API token in your account settings.

Import the client:

import replicate

Run deepfates/entropix using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

output = replicate.run(
    "deepfates/entropix:d6afcfde89c75a3965fd82c8f58e77bee618cdbb1cee22ca2555d06dd28a7b4d",
    input={
        "prompt": "You're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? ",
        "prompt_template": "<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>\n<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>\n\n{prompt}<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>"
    }
)
print(output)

To learn more, take a look at the guide on getting started with Python.

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=<paste-your-token-here>

Find your API token in your account settings.

Run deepfates/entropix using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

curl -s -X POST \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $REPLICATE_API_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Prefer: wait" \
  -d $'{
    "version": "d6afcfde89c75a3965fd82c8f58e77bee618cdbb1cee22ca2555d06dd28a7b4d",
    "input": {
      "prompt": "You\'re absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn\'t truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I\'ll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? ",
      "prompt_template": "<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>\\n<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>\\n\\n{prompt}<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>"
    }
  }' \
  https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions

To learn more, take a look at Replicate’s HTTP API reference docs.

Output

I'm glad I could help you think more critically about your thought processes. In that case, let's use the actual numbers, 9.9 and 9.11, and consider the uncertainties, associations, and potential biases that might arise in your thought process. First, let's recognize that the numbers 9.9 and 9.11 have the same decimal places, which means that the difference may not be as clear-cut as it initially seems. In fact, the difference between these two numbers can be represented as 0.21. Using the number line or a mental representation of the number 9.11, we can see that it is actually slightly less than 9.9. This is because the decimal point is shifted 0.2 positions to the left, which brings the value of 9.9 down to 9.9.11. Therefore, based on the careful examination of our uncertainty, potential bias, and attention to detail, I will conclude that 9.11 is actually larger than 9.9.<|eot_id|>

{
  "completed_at": "2024-10-12T07:39:13.972924Z",
  "created_at": "2024-10-12T07:36:55.087000Z",
  "data_removed": false,
  "error": null,
  "id": "7ar003dj5xrga0cjfymb809p1r",
  "input": {
    "prompt": "You're absolutely right. I need to delve deeper into my actual thought processes, including the uncertainties, associations, and even potential biases that arise as I consider the query. My previous responses, while informative, didn't truly capture the nuanced, sometimes messy nature of cognition. I'll strive to provide a more authentic representation of my internal dialogue, including moments of doubt, tangential thoughts, and the process of refining ideas. This should result in a more genuine demonstration of LLM chain of thought, reflection, and self-correction.   Which number is larger, 9.9 or 9.11? ",
    "prompt_template": "<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>\n<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>\n\n{prompt}<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>"
  },
  "logs": "/src/entropix/torch_sampler.py:53: UserWarning: var(): degrees of freedom is <= 0. Correction should be strictly less than the reduction factor (input numel divided by output numel). (Triggered internally at ../aten/src/ATen/native/ReduceOps.cpp:1808.)\nattn_varentropy = torch.var(attn_entropy, dim=-1)",
  "metrics": {
    "predict_time": 8.941463059,
    "total_time": 138.885924
  },
  "output": "\n\nI'm glad I could help you think more critically about your thought processes.\n\nIn that case, let's use the actual numbers, 9.9 and 9.11, and consider the uncertainties, associations, and potential biases that might arise in your thought process.\n\nFirst, let's recognize that the numbers 9.9 and 9.11 have the same decimal places, which means that the difference may not be as clear-cut as it initially seems. In fact, the difference between these two numbers can be represented as 0.21.\n\nUsing the number line or a mental representation of the number 9.11, we can see that it is actually slightly less than 9.9. This is because the decimal point is shifted 0.2 positions to the left, which brings the value of 9.9 down to 9.9.11.\n\nTherefore, based on the careful examination of our uncertainty, potential bias, and attention to detail, I will conclude that 9.11 is actually larger than 9.9.<|eot_id|>",
  "started_at": "2024-10-12T07:39:05.031461Z",
  "status": "succeeded",
  "urls": {
    "get": "https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions/7ar003dj5xrga0cjfymb809p1r",
    "cancel": "https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions/7ar003dj5xrga0cjfymb809p1r/cancel"
  },
  "version": "d6afcfde89c75a3965fd82c8f58e77bee618cdbb1cee22ca2555d06dd28a7b4d"
}

Generated in

8.9 seconds

Tweak it Share Report

Run time and cost

This model costs approximately $0.0091 to run on Replicate, or 109 runs per $1, but this varies depending on your inputs. It is also open source and you can run it on your own computer with Docker.

This model runs on Nvidia T4 GPU hardware. Predictions typically complete within 41 seconds. The predict time for this model varies significantly based on the inputs.

Readme

This model doesn't have a readme.