Prediction

Model

0xroyce/plutus:09507667

zpr90p9s2xrj60chtb6bk4dwmc

Status

Succeeded

Source

Web

Hardware

A100 (80GB)

Total duration

1m 43s

Created

over 1 year ago

Webhook

–

Input

prompt: Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?
max_tokens: 1024
temperature: 0.7
top_p: 0.95
repeat_penalty: 1.1

{
  "max_tokens": 1024,
  "prompt": "Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?",
  "repeat_penalty": 1.1,
  "temperature": 0.7,
  "top_p": 0.95
}

Install Replicate’s Node.js client library:

npm install replicate

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=r8_Etp**********************************

This is your API token. Keep it to yourself.

Import and set up the client:

import Replicate from "replicate";

const replicate = new Replicate({
  auth: process.env.REPLICATE_API_TOKEN,
});

Run 0xroyce/plutus using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

const output = await replicate.run(
  "0xroyce/plutus:09507667c1086d4a010e9bb49a13b6561d40919734252318d2d3f9a644c52e7d",
  {
    input: {
      max_tokens: 1024,
      prompt: "Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?",
      repeat_penalty: 1.1,
      temperature: 0.7,
      top_p: 0.95
    }
  }
);

console.log(output);

To learn more, take a look at the guide on getting started with Node.js.

Install Replicate’s Python client library:

pip install replicate

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=r8_Etp**********************************

This is your API token. Keep it to yourself.

Import the client:

import replicate

Run 0xroyce/plutus using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

output = replicate.run(
    "0xroyce/plutus:09507667c1086d4a010e9bb49a13b6561d40919734252318d2d3f9a644c52e7d",
    input={
        "max_tokens": 1024,
        "prompt": "Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?",
        "repeat_penalty": 1.1,
        "temperature": 0.7,
        "top_p": 0.95
    }
)

print(output)

To learn more, take a look at the guide on getting started with Python.

Set the REPLICATE_API_TOKEN environment variable:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=r8_Etp**********************************

This is your API token. Keep it to yourself.

Run 0xroyce/plutus using Replicate’s API. Check out the model's schema for an overview of inputs and outputs.

curl -s -X POST \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $REPLICATE_API_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Prefer: wait" \
  -d $'{
    "version": "0xroyce/plutus:09507667c1086d4a010e9bb49a13b6561d40919734252318d2d3f9a644c52e7d",
    "input": {
      "max_tokens": 1024,
      "prompt": "Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?",
      "repeat_penalty": 1.1,
      "temperature": 0.7,
      "top_p": 0.95
    }
  }' \
  https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions

To learn more, take a look at Replicate’s HTTP API reference docs.

Output

Let's examine the evidence.
The Elliott Wave Theory has gained a significant following among traders and investors over the years. Its proponents claim that wave patterns can accurately forecast future price movements in the markets. However, critics argue that these predictions are often based on hindsight, which is nothing more than confirmation bias.

## Step 1: Understanding the Elliott Wave Theory
The Elliott Wave Theory posits that market prices move in predictable waves, with each wave representing a specific phase of market activity. There are five primary wave movements, followed by three corrective moves, forming an ABC pattern. This theory suggests that understanding these patterns can provide insights into future price fluctuations.

## Step 2: Examining the Predictive Accuracy
Proponents of Elliott Wave Theory often point to historical examples where predicted wave movements align with actual market behavior. For instance, during significant market events like the crash of 1987 or the rise to new highs in the late 1990s, analysts claim that their predictions were correct, demonstrating the theory's effectiveness.

## Step 3: Identifying Confirmation Bias
Critics argue that many instances where Elliott Wave Theory appears successful can be explained by confirmation bias. This cognitive bias occurs when individuals selectively focus on data that confirms their beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence. As a result, they might mistakenly believe that the theory is accurate due to its alignment with past events.

## Step 4: Analyzing the Evidence
A critical assessment of historical market movements reveals that many instances cited as proof of Elliott Wave Theory's predictive power can be explained by random chance or selective interpretation. This suggests that the perceived success may not necessarily reflect the theory’s actual predictive capabilities, but rather a result of hindsight bias.

## Step 5: Conclusion
In summary, while proponents of the Elliott Wave Theory claim it provides reliable predictions for market movements, an objective analysis reveals that many claims are based on confirmation bias and selective interpretation of historical data. The theory may not be as effective in predicting future movements as its proponents suggest, highlighting the need for skepticism when interpreting such theories.

The final answer is: $\boxed{0}$ (Indicating that there is no conclusive evidence to support Elliott Wave Theory's claims.)

{
  "id": "zpr90p9s2xrj60chtb6bk4dwmc",
  "model": "0xroyce/plutus",
  "version": "09507667c1086d4a010e9bb49a13b6561d40919734252318d2d3f9a644c52e7d",
  "input": {
    "max_tokens": 1024,
    "prompt": "Can Elliott Wave Theory truly predict market movements, or is it just confirmation bias at work?",
    "repeat_penalty": 1.1,
    "temperature": 0.7,
    "top_p": 0.95
  },
  "logs": "Llama.generate: 18 prefix-match hit, remaining 1 prompt tokens to eval\nllama_print_timings:        load time =    1803.49 ms\nllama_print_timings:      sample time =     372.82 ms /   439 runs   (    0.85 ms per token,  1177.52 tokens per second)\nllama_print_timings: prompt eval time =       0.00 ms /     0 tokens (    -nan ms per token,     -nan tokens per second)\nllama_print_timings:        eval time =  102037.28 ms /   439 runs   (  232.43 ms per token,     4.30 tokens per second)\nllama_print_timings:       total time =  102935.53 ms /   439 tokens\nInference time: 102.94 seconds\nTokens per second: 3.57\nInput length: 16\nOutput length: 368",
  "output": " Let's examine the evidence.\nThe Elliott Wave Theory has gained a significant following among traders and investors over the years. Its proponents claim that wave patterns can accurately forecast future price movements in the markets. However, critics argue that these predictions are often based on hindsight, which is nothing more than confirmation bias.\n\n## Step 1: Understanding the Elliott Wave Theory\nThe Elliott Wave Theory posits that market prices move in predictable waves, with each wave representing a specific phase of market activity. There are five primary wave movements, followed by three corrective moves, forming an ABC pattern. This theory suggests that understanding these patterns can provide insights into future price fluctuations.\n\n## Step 2: Examining the Predictive Accuracy\nProponents of Elliott Wave Theory often point to historical examples where predicted wave movements align with actual market behavior. For instance, during significant market events like the crash of 1987 or the rise to new highs in the late 1990s, analysts claim that their predictions were correct, demonstrating the theory's effectiveness.\n\n## Step 3: Identifying Confirmation Bias\nCritics argue that many instances where Elliott Wave Theory appears successful can be explained by confirmation bias. This cognitive bias occurs when individuals selectively focus on data that confirms their beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence. As a result, they might mistakenly believe that the theory is accurate due to its alignment with past events.\n\n## Step 4: Analyzing the Evidence\nA critical assessment of historical market movements reveals that many instances cited as proof of Elliott Wave Theory's predictive power can be explained by random chance or selective interpretation. This suggests that the perceived success may not necessarily reflect the theory’s actual predictive capabilities, but rather a result of hindsight bias.\n\n## Step 5: Conclusion\nIn summary, while proponents of the Elliott Wave Theory claim it provides reliable predictions for market movements, an objective analysis reveals that many claims are based on confirmation bias and selective interpretation of historical data. The theory may not be as effective in predicting future movements as its proponents suggest, highlighting the need for skepticism when interpreting such theories.\n\nThe final answer is: $\\boxed{0}$ (Indicating that there is no conclusive evidence to support Elliott Wave Theory's claims.)",
  "data_removed": false,
  "error": null,
  "source": "web",
  "status": "succeeded",
  "created_at": "2024-09-08T18:01:25.015Z",
  "started_at": "2024-09-08T18:01:25.025684Z",
  "completed_at": "2024-09-08T18:03:07.963663Z",
  "urls": {
    "cancel": "https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions/zpr90p9s2xrj60chtb6bk4dwmc/cancel",
    "get": "https://api.replicate.com/v1/predictions/zpr90p9s2xrj60chtb6bk4dwmc",
    "web": "https://replicate.com/p/zpr90p9s2xrj60chtb6bk4dwmc"
  },
  "metrics": {
    "predict_time": 102.937978143,
    "total_time": 102.948663
  }
}

Generated in

1 minute 43 seconds

Tweak it Report